Louis Dudek wrote, “An education is like a crumbling building that needs constant upkeep with repairs and additions.” This very quote could be easily applied to today’s middle schools. Presently, “throughout the United States, there is deep dissatisfaction with education at the middle [school] level,” and many opponents are once again calling for repairs and reformation (Mizell, 2003). Despite the fact that middle schools were considered an innovative reform movement designed to change junior high schools into an environment better suited for adolescents, today’s middle schools have earned a negative reputation due to years of unimpressive student achievement. As a result, some schools are slowly migrating back to a traditional junior high concept. Therefore, is the middle school concept dead? No. However, it certainly is on life support.
Today’s middle schools have a black eye. A majority of “students in…America’s middle schools are adrift,” and evidence suggests “that thousands of complacent middle schools are wasting student potential” (Mizell, 2003). But why? The Edna McConnell Clark Foundation (1998) contends that a lack of rigorous and challenging academic environment for students is a main contributor to poor student achievement. Simply, it is a lack of high standards that is undermining America’s youth. Along those lines, authors Midgley and Edelin (1998) hypothesize that “positive interpersonal relationships and emphasis on understanding, mastery, and challenge…deteriorated when students moved from elementary to middle-level schools.” Luckily, many middle schools have made significant progress in improving student-teacher relationships; however, the lack of emphasis on the mastery of challenging material has not shown improvement. Therefore, do the aforementioned authors have a point? Do American middle school students rank below many third-world countries in math and science skills because middle school educators and administrators have low expectations of their students? According to our assigned reading, there are many additional factors that may hinder student achievement.
In our textbook, authors Flowers, Merten, and Mulhall offer the reader a myriad of research findings that address the problems facing American middle schools. One article, School Size Matters in Interesting Ways, tackles the issue of school population. Since many middle schools around the nation are bursting at the seams with growing student populations, the article is especially relevant and offers evidence that “smaller is better” (Flowers, Mertens, and Mulhall, 2007). In fact, students in school with populations less than 749 tend to have “slightly higher levels of self-esteem and academic efficacy” (Flowers, Mertens, and Mulhall, 2007). Another obstacle in student achievement, a decrease in parent involvement and understanding, is also addressed. In the article How Familiar Are Parents with Middle Level Practices? researchers suggest that parents were “generally not aware of established middle level practices” and that schools should expect to educate “parents and the community about the qualities and expectations of a high-performing middle school” (Flowers, Mertens, and Mulhall, 2007). Lastly, high poverty schools and economically disadvantaged students are examined in the article Middle School Practices Improvement Achievement in High Poverty Schools. According to the researchers findings “implementation of interdisciplinary teaming and common planning time [was] critical to increasing levels of practices” and higher student achievement (Flowers, Mertens, and Mulhall, 2007). Needless to say, the abovementioned articles addressed only a few of the problems, which are suffocating today’s middle schools.
In closing, it is obvious that an overwhelming amount of research is available, which could heal America’s ailing middle schools. Therefore, why are students still not achieving a following behind their peers in other parts of the world? Why is the middle concept slowly dying? I will offer with my own admittedly biased opinion and say that in many schools the research is stubbornly not being utilized, and if it is, it is not being used with fidelity. Even based on my own teaching experiences, I have seen many half-hearted attempts to implement academic, research-based programs, and the results were generally fleeting and unimpressive. The foreword of our textbook echoes this sentiment, “When the full middle school concept becomes standard practice, student achievement improve” (Flowers, Mertens, and Mulhall, 2007). In addition to the inadequate or improper use of research, I also believe that exceptionally low expectations for middle grades students are compounding the problem. Until the day that all teachers, administrators, and parents have high, challenging expectations for their students and utilize research-proven methods, American middle schools will continue to struggle and slowly fade into oblivion.
Works CitedEdelin, K.C., & Midgley, C. (1998). Middle School Reform and Early Adolescent Well-Being: the Good News and the Bad News. Educational Psychologist, 33, Retrieved September 6, 2007, from http://www.questia.com.
Flowers, N., Mertens, S., & Mulhall, P. (2007). Applying current middle grades research to improve classrooms and schools. Westerville: National Middle School Association.Mizell, Hayes (2003). Guiding questions for middle grades reform. Retrieved September 4, 2007, from Middleweb Web site: http://www.middleweb.com“Why do we need middle school reform?” MiddleWeb. 1998. Edna McConnell Clark Foundation. 6 Sep 2007 <http://www.middleweb.com>.